Landing pages · replacement recipe

Landing pages without a visual builder

Replaces Unbounce. 2 ways out. Best: Replace with AI: owned landing pages (replace with ai), about $518 saved in year one.

Modeled, not measured. Savings use public prices and planning assumptions: the bill you stop paying, minus the new tool, your upkeep time and your setup time at $50/hour, over the first 12 months. No verified migrations yet. Check the must-haves in each recipe before you switch.

What you use

Responsive pages
Lead capture
Analytics events
Custom domain

Not covered

Visual editing parity
Traffic optimization
Experimentation platform
Thousands of integrations

Check before switching

Developer-owned updates acceptable
No required optimization feature
Content and SEO redirects preserved

Agents: get_recipe("static-landing") on the Stackcut MCP server.

2 ways out, best first

Replace with AIReplace with AI: owned landing pagesSaves $518 in year one

$99/mo today → $10/mo + 0.25 h upkeep · setup 6 h + $100 · then $918/yr · payback 5.2 mo

Three static campaign pages, lead capture, ≤20k visits/month

Observed $99 public price; confirm billing cadence and quote before a personalized claim.

Sources: unbounce.com

Switch vendorTallySavings not modeled yet

Sources: tally.so

All 63 recipes · Savings leaderboard