Head to head · Make

Make vs Activepieces in 2026: what each costs, what moves, and who switched

Moving from Make to Activepieces: what Activepieces's importer carries over and 3 public accounts of the switch, plus how to leave Make. Every item links its source.

Modeled, not measured. Savings use public prices and planning assumptions: the bill you stop paying, minus the new tool, your upkeep time and your setup time at $50/hour, over the first 12 months. Results marked Tested by Stackcut are Stackcut's own test, not a customer. Every price links the page it came from.

The short answer

  • Moving from Make Core to Activepieces (free tier) saves $94 in the first year, after setup and upkeep time (Stackcut's model: modeled, not measured).
  • Activepieces's community migration guide moves 1 partly; 3 things stay behind. What moves
  • 3 public accounts of making this switch: 3 switched. Read them

What Make and Activepieces cost

List prices from each vendor's pricing page, as stored in the Stackcut catalog. Each price links its source.

PlanBilled monthlyBilled yearly (per month)What you get
Make Core$12/monot shown10,000 credits/mo; unlimited active scenarios; 1-minute interval
Make Pro$21/monot shown10,000 credits/mo; priority execution, custom variables
Make Teams$38/monot shown10,000 credits/mo; team roles and templates
Activepieces Plus$20/monot shown10,000 credits/month, up to 5 users
Activepieces Team$200/monot shown50,000 credits/month, 25 users
  • Make free plan: 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, 15-minute minimum interval make.com
  • Activepieces free plan: 100 credits a day (a run is 1 credit), 1 user; runs past the quota wait for the next day activepieces.com

Moving from Make to Activepieces

What Activepieces's importer carries over, what it leaves behind, and any help it offers switchers.

To Activepieces

Community guide use-apify.com · Tools: Activepieces flow builder

Moves: Flow logic (triggers, actions, branches) (partial). use-apify.com

Doesn't move: Make scenario blueprints (JSON is not importable into Activepieces); Make Data Stores (must be replaced by database connections or Redis); Anything relying on Make-only modules with no Activepieces piece equivalent. use-apify.com

Watch out for:

  • No automated migration tool exists — flows are rebuilt manually in Activepieces use-apify.com
  • Activepieces has 280+ integrations versus Make's 3,000+, so expect connector gaps use-apify.com
  • Make-specific features like Data Stores need replacement solutions (database, Redis) use-apify.com

Community guide betterstack.com · Tools: Activepieces Docker image, Activepieces web UI, HTTP piece / webhooks

Moves: Flow logic (trigger-action workflows) (partial). betterstack.com

Doesn't move: Service connections; Workflows depending on integrations Activepieces lacks natively (unless rebuilt via the HTTP piece or custom TypeScript pieces). betterstack.com

Watch out for:

  • Without the ~/.activepieces volume mount, all data is lost when the container updates or restarts betterstack.com
  • The default Docker deployment exposes the web interface on port 80 without HTTPS betterstack.com
  • Third-party API rate limits (Gmail, Slack) often constrain throughput more than Activepieces itself betterstack.com

From each destination's own migration docs and switching pages, plus community write-ups where no official guide exists, each checked against its page. Confirm terms on the linked page before you rely on an offer.

People who moved from Make to Activepieces

3 public accounts of leaving Make: 3 switched. Summaries are ours; each links the original, and each was checked against its page before it appeared here.

Switched to Activepieces · May 2025

A reviewer who tried Make, Latenode, Pabbly and n8n picked Activepieces on price and migrated everything over, then downgraded the review to 2 stars in mid-2025 updates after unannounced pricing changes and support failures 'forced us to reconsider our platform selection.' Trustpilot

Switched to Activepieces · Sep 2024

A user who tried Zapier and Integromat (Make) reports Activepieces now runs their most critical automations, including auto-posting YouTube videos to WordPress and syncing calendars, with a short learning curve. Trustpilot

Switched to Activepieces · Jun 2024 · Runs an e-commerce business and complex client services, per the review

An e-commerce and client-services operator who has 'been around the block' with Albato and Make says Activepieces became the go-to for critical complex automations, at the cost of a learning curve for anyone not familiar with APIs. Trustpilot

FAQ

Is Activepieces cheaper than Make?

Modeled, not measured: moving from Make Core to Activepieces (free tier) saves $94 in the first year, after setup and upkeep time at $50/hour. It depends on your plan, seats and usage. the math

Can I move my Make data to Activepieces?

Activepieces's community guide moves: Flow logic (triggers, actions, branches). It doesn't move: Make scenario blueprints (JSON is not importable into Activepieces); Make Data Stores (must be replaced by database connections or Redis); Anything relying on Make-only modules with no Activepieces piece equivalent. use-apify.com

Keep reading

Check your own stack

Get your free stack audit

Stackcut finds every software subscription in your inbox and shows what to cancel, what to pay per use, and what AI can replace, with a spec and a cost for each. Your stack audit is free and takes about 2 minutes.

Or ask your agent

Connect the Stackcut MCP server (https://stackcut.io/mcp, no API key) and ask: “We pay for Make. Should we move to Activepieces?”

find_alternatives({"vendor": "Make"})